The LESS THAN pentagonal file:

to pun on circular file:
to be filed to reads.

Not read, yet glanced at, and filed in a particular order:^^
Dark Affinities: Liberal and Neoliberal
Each society determines which thoughts and feelings shall be permitted to arrive at the level of awareness and which have to remain unconscious. Just as there is a social character, there is also a "social unconscious."
- Eric Fromm  ^

Mike Lofgren | Gates Agonistes
"Eyeless in Gaza, at the mill with slaves."
– John Milton, Samson Agonistes

Chris Hedges | What Obama Really Meant Was...

Two Obama Lies Leave Little Room for Privacy Rights

And MORE THAN** TRIANGULAR FILE.

Caution: There may be quilting.

[Deep google of the day*]

*not every day nor maybe ever(hypospectral)

** lucky glance of the day ^
Gregory D. Johnsen wrote, "Maybe it shouldn't be so surprising that Congress didn't think about how the war would end when it passed the AUMF on Sept. 14, 2001, but after more than a dozen years, we are no closer to an answer."

^ (b.s.) sorted in reverse order:
z.- (s.c.) Pink Floyd ,
y.- (no Hoyle),
x.- Epicyclical Poet Tree, Fiddle Sticks^, c. , d. Update
w.- It's Obama's Turn, d. Are We "IN" Yet?, e. Stay the Comity of Course ...h. Notes from Al-Qaeda , l. I'm not a lawyer but... , s. FEINGOLD'S STAKE(a-s)

v.- Coordinary
u.- Coin-age of the day., Epicyclical Poet Tree, Relavent, Forward (Ironically)(a-d)

r.- The LESS THAN pentagonal file: Bury the lede? Too Random... (a-c)

Not my intent to be so geo-patch worked.  But to clarify a bit.  After my Neo-Platonic^^ primes of physics, psychology, philosophy and politics. Obama has his concerns as Commander-in-Chief, Leader of the Free World and facilitator of change, in the realm of economics and world pieces.  

^^ not that I am using the term correctly [!]

^  1-22-14 Not that I got there yet.
^^ 1-23-14 punctuation added

Uniting?
A reply to John Carlson's yet to be published or read column. Sent 2-22-03
His column was printed 2-23-03.

John Carlson asks; "What are the anti-war marchers actually for?" Maybe one who marched could answer better, but they marched with my heartfelt support. That question may have been one reason for any hesitancy if that. However it should be simple. They are for peace, and not war. They are for the multitude of methods of working for peace and for preventing war. Are they united under one method of getting there? I think not.

To say they are only against something (as I assume a day before reading his piece) is as wrong as saying hawks are only for war. To say protesters must unite in favor of one idea is as wrong as saying that the war has only one goal. To disarm Iraq is it? Fine, the message is getting clearer. Thanks to whom? Regime change? That too has had its evolution in terminology. Thanks to whom?

Tough talk may have pushed the world to where it is, but it may not get it out of it’s spot so easy. Maybe George Bush has been a uniter not a divider. Did he foresee whom he would unite? It will depend on if he can get out of the corner, he seems to have painted himself into, and upon what he has united the world. It is finishing the job and how we, if united, will be moving on to the next job that will be tricky. Let us hope we are not all in the same corner.